Government final consumption is one of the national-accounts components that shows how much governments use goods and services to provide public services. World Bank series NE.CON.GOVT.ZS expresses that spending as a share of GDP. The latest available data cover 188 countries and separately reported economies, with reference years ranging from 1983 to 2025. For a clean cross-country snapshot, the main map and ranking use only the 132 observations dated 2025.
Across that 2025 set, the unweighted median is 16.2% of GDP and the mean is 16.5%. Korea is 17.65%. The indicator is narrower than total government expenditure: it focuses on government final consumption rather than every transfer, interest payment, or capital project recorded elsewhere in public finance accounts.

Table of Contents
What government final consumption measures
The World Bank definition covers government current expenditures for purchases of goods and services, including compensation of employees. Most national defense and security expenditure is included, while military expenditure classified as capital formation is excluded. In national-accounts terms, the series is intended to capture the value of goods and services consumed by government in providing collective and individual public services.
That makes the indicator different from a broad budget-spending ratio. Cash transfers, interest payments, capital investment and other transactions can be recorded outside government final consumption. Two governments can therefore provide similar levels of support through different accounting channels and show different values on this measure. The ratio should not be used as a one-number ranking of government size, fiscal generosity, or administrative quality.
The 2025 median is 16.2% of GDP
When the 132 same-year observations are given equal weight, the median is 16.2% and the mean is 16.5%. The middle half runs from roughly 11.8% to 20.4%. Most observations sit between 10% and 25%, while only five are at or above 30%. The simple mean is a country-level summary, not a GDP-weighted world government-consumption ratio.
| 2025 government final consumption / GDP | Countries/areas | Share of 132 |
|---|---|---|
| Below 10% | 18 | 13.6% |
| 10% to <15% | 36 | 27.3% |
| 15% to <20% | 43 | 32.6% |
| 20% to <25% | 25 | 18.9% |
| 25% to <30% | 5 | 3.8% |
| 30% or more | 5 | 3.8% |
The largest band is 15% to below 20%, containing 43 observations. Another 36 fall between 10% and 15%, and 25 are between 20% and 25%. This concentration explains why the map has a broad middle range rather than a simple divide between high-spending and low-spending regions.
Ukraine, Lesotho, Equatorial Guinea and Libya are highest in the 2025 set
| Country/area | Government final consumption / GDP |
|---|---|
| Ukraine | 38.9% |
| Lesotho | 36.4% |
| Equatorial Guinea | 32.4% |
| Libya | 32.3% |
| Botswana | 31.5% |
| Sweden | 26.4% |
| Finland | 26.1% |
| Iceland | 26.1% |
| Netherlands | 25.9% |
| Seychelles | 25.1% |
Ukraine has the highest 2025 observation at 38.9%, followed by Lesotho at 36.4%, Equatorial Guinea at 32.4%, Libya at 32.3%, and Botswana at 31.5%. Sweden, Finland and Iceland are around 26%. The data establish that these ratios are high relative to other 2025 observations; they do not by themselves establish why. Country-specific explanations would require detailed fiscal and national-accounts evidence.
A high ratio can reflect a relatively large direct public-service footprint, a smaller GDP denominator, exceptional spending conditions, or a combination of factors. The indicator alone cannot separate those channels, so the map is best used to identify places that warrant a deeper country-level look.
Egypt, Haiti, Cambodia and Bangladesh are at the low end
| Country/area | Government final consumption / GDP |
|---|---|
| Egypt, Arab Rep. | 5.4% |
| Haiti | 5.5% |
| Cambodia | 5.7% |
| Bangladesh | 5.8% |
| Ethiopia | 5.8% |
| Sierra Leone | 5.9% |
| Sri Lanka | 6.7% |
| Indonesia | 7.5% |
| Puerto Rico (US) | 7.7% |
| Somalia, Fed. Rep. | 8.1% |
Egypt records 5.4%, Haiti 5.5%, Cambodia 5.7%, Bangladesh 5.8%, and Ethiopia 5.8%. Indonesia is 7.5%. A low value should not automatically be interpreted as weak public services or a small overall budget. Governments can spend through transfers, subsidies or investment, and the GDP denominator can differ sharply across economies.
Korea is 17.6% in 2025
| Country | 2025 government final consumption / GDP |
|---|---|
| Korea, Rep. | 17.6% |
| Australia | 23.1% |
| Canada | 21.9% |
| Germany | 22.5% |
| France | 24.4% |
| United Kingdom | 21.2% |
| Brazil | 19.1% |
| India | 10.8% |
| Indonesia | 7.5% |
| Mexico | 11.8% |
| Sweden | 26.4% |
| Finland | 26.1% |
Korea’s 2025 value is 17.6%, about 1.4 percentage points above the same-year median. France is 24.4%, Australia 23.1%, Germany 22.5%, Canada 21.9%, the United Kingdom 21.2%, and Brazil 19.1%. India is 10.8%, Mexico 11.8%, and Indonesia 7.5%. These figures compare the relative scale of final government consumption, not fiscal health or value for money.
Why the United States, China and Japan are not in the 2025 ranking
| Country | Latest reference year | Ratio to GDP |
|---|---|---|
| China | 2024 | 16.7% |
| Japan | 2024 | 20.1% |
| United States | 2024 | 13.6% |
The latest World Bank values available for the United States, China and Japan are for 2024 rather than 2025. They remain useful statistics, but mixing them into a strict 2025 ranking would add a time difference to the geographic comparison. Their latest values are 13.6% for the United States, 16.7% for China, and 20.1% for Japan.

Why the ratio can move even when policy is not changing in one direction
The numerator and denominator both matter. The ratio can rise because government final consumption increases, but it can also rise when nominal GDP falls while spending changes little. Conversely, government consumption can increase in currency terms while the ratio declines if GDP grows faster. To explain a year-to-year move, analysts should examine both the expenditure level and the GDP denominator rather than treating the percentage as a direct spending-growth rate.
Institutional design also matters for cross-country interpretation. Governments that directly employ teachers, health workers and other service providers can record spending differently from systems that rely more heavily on transfers, reimbursements, contracted providers or other mechanisms. The ratio is comparable as a national-accounts concept, but it is not a complete map of everything the public sector finances.
Government final consumption is not the fiscal balance, debt, or total expenditure
A fiscal balance compares government revenue with a broader measure of expenditure and net lending or borrowing. Government debt is a stock accumulated over time. Total expenditure can include transfers, interest and capital formation that are not equivalent to final consumption. NE.CON.GOVT.ZS therefore answers a narrower question: how large is government final consumption relative to the economy in that year?
That narrowness is useful when the question is about the direct public-service consumption component of GDP. It becomes a limitation when the question is about the total tax burden, welfare transfers, public investment, deficits or debt. Those require separate indicators.
Source and comparison method
The statistical source is World Bank World Development Indicators series NE.CON.GOVT.ZS, General government final consumption expenditure (% of GDP). The World Bank metadata identifies official country statistics, national accounts records, central banks and World Bank staff estimates among the sources. All headline rankings, bands and summary statistics here use only the 132 observations dated 2025.
The full latest-observation table spans 1983–2025. Of the 188 rows, 132 are dated 2025, 37 are dated 2024, 8 fall in 2020–2023, and 11 are from 2019 or earlier. Missing values are not converted to zero and older observations are not relabeled as 2025.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is government final consumption the same as total government spending?
No. It measures the final-consumption component of government activity, including purchases of goods and services and employee compensation, rather than every transfer, interest payment or capital expenditure in a government budget.
What is Korea’s 2025 government final consumption share of GDP?
Korea’s 2025 observation in World Bank NE.CON.GOVT.ZS is about 17.65% of GDP. The median across the 132 same-year observations is about 16.2%.
Does a higher ratio mean the government is more efficient?
No. The ratio measures the relative size of government final consumption and does not directly measure service quality, efficiency, fiscal sustainability or welfare outcomes.
Why are the United States, China and Japan excluded from the 2025 ranking?
The latest World Bank values available for the United States, China and Japan are for 2024. The ranking uses only 2025 observations so that countries are compared on the same reference year.
Related Articles
Government final consumption, GDP growth, GDP per capita and market capitalization use the same broad economic context but answer different questions. These pages are useful companions for separating public-service consumption from output growth, output per person and financial-market scale.
- Global GDP Growth Map – Country Patterns in 2025
- Global GDP per Capita Map – Country Levels in 2025
- How Large Are Listed Equity Markets Relative to GDP? 2025
Green Map creates custom-edited map images using open geographic data sources such as geoBoundaries, Natural Earth, OpenStreetMap, and government open data.
These maps are edited visual materials, not raw data files, and are provided for education, documents, presentations, and graphic reference.





