A country can generate a large amount of national income while also using up machines, buildings, other fixed assets, and natural resources in the process. The World Bank’s Adjusted net national income per capita (current US$) is designed to reflect that distinction. It starts from gross national income (GNI), subtracts consumption of fixed capital and natural-resource depletion, and then expresses the remainder on a per-person basis.
The source file contains the latest non-empty observation for 185 economies, but those observations do not all refer to the same year. To make a true cross-country comparison, the map and rankings below keep only the 169 observations dated 2021. Across that same-year set, the median is about $4,085 per person and the simple unweighted mean is about $11,549. The mean is much higher than the median because a relatively small group of very high-income economies stretches the upper end of the distribution.
Table of Contents
What is subtracted from GNI to produce adjusted net national income?
The World Bank definition is direct: adjusted net national income equals GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural-resource depletion. Consumption of fixed capital captures the loss in value of produced assets such as buildings, machinery and equipment as they are used and age. Natural-resource depletion accounts for the economic value of resources that are reduced through extraction or harvest, including energy, minerals and forests within the World Bank framework.
That makes the indicator different from a gross production measure. Part of the income generated in an economy is needed simply to replace worn-out produced capital, and some income may be associated with drawing down natural assets. Subtracting those amounts gives a narrower income concept. The World Bank also notes that adjusted net national income is not the same as adjusted net savings: it does not add human-capital investment in the same way or subtract the broader set of pollution damages used in that savings framework.
Why this is not another version of GDP per capita
GDP per capita divides production within an economy by population. Adjusted net national income starts from GNI, which follows income accruing to residents rather than production located strictly inside the territory. It then subtracts fixed-capital consumption and natural-resource depletion. Cross-border income flows, depreciation-like capital consumption, resource depletion and population can therefore make the ranking differ from a GDP-per-capita table.
The unit is also important. This series is expressed in current U.S. dollars, so it has not been adjusted for inflation and it is not a purchasing-power-parity measure. The map is useful for comparing economies at one point in time, but a change between 2010 and 2021 can reflect prices and exchange rates as well as real income. The figure should not be read as average household wages, disposable income, or the amount a typical resident actually receives.
The 2021 median is about $4,085 per person
Among the 169 same-year observations, the median is $4,085, the 25th percentile is about $1,747, and the 75th percentile is about $14,553. The minimum is roughly $151 in Burundi, while the maximum is about $77,781 in Luxembourg. That range is more than 500-fold, which is why a single world average hides most of the important structure in the data.
| 2021 value per person | Number of economies |
|---|---|
| Below $1,000 | 27 |
| $1,000 to below $2,500 | 26 |
| $2,500 to below $5,000 | 40 |
| $5,000 to below $10,000 | 26 |
| $10,000 to below $25,000 | 26 |
| $25,000 to below $50,000 | 15 |
| $50,000 or more | 9 |
The largest band is $2,500 to below $5,000, containing 40 economies. Twenty-seven are below $1,000, while only nine are at or above $50,000. The simple mean of $11,549 is therefore not a good description of the “typical” observation. The median and the distribution bands give a clearer picture of how strongly the data are skewed toward a small number of very high values.
Luxembourg, Norway and Switzerland have the highest 2021 values
Luxembourg is highest at about $77,781 per person, followed by Norway at $69,953 and Switzerland at $69,632. The United States is about $58,997, Denmark $58,796, Iceland $54,204, Sweden $51,831, Qatar $51,677, Singapore $50,690, and Ireland $48,856. This is a per-person ranking, not a ranking of total national income, so small high-income economies can appear near the top even though their aggregate economies are much smaller than the United States.
The upper end contains a concentration of high-income European economies, but it is not exclusively European. The United States, Qatar and Singapore are also in the top ten. A high final value does not prove that capital consumption or resource depletion is low. The result combines the starting GNI level, the two deductions and population; identifying which component drives a particular country requires the corresponding component series.
The lowest ten observations are around $500 per person or less
At the lower end, Burundi is about $151 per person. The Democratic Republic of the Congo is about $328, Liberia $339, Afghanistan $341, Somalia $356, Mozambique $371, the Central African Republic $417, Timor-Leste $418, Madagascar $421, and Sierra Leone $426. The concentration of low observations across Sub-Saharan Africa is one of the most visible geographic patterns on the map.
Those low values should not be attributed to natural-resource depletion alone. The calculation starts from GNI, so economies with very low national income will generally remain low after the deductions. The final adjusted value does not reveal how much was removed for fixed-capital consumption versus resource depletion. That decomposition requires additional indicators and is not contained in this single series.
Korea is about $28,059; Japan $30,520; China $9,015
| Economy | 2021 current US$ per person |
|---|---|
| Korea, Rep. | $28,059 |
| Japan | $30,520 |
| China | $9,015 |
| United States | $58,997 |
| Canada | $41,986 |
| Germany | $42,982 |
| France | $36,448 |
| India | $1,907 |
| Indonesia | $3,189 |
| Brazil | $5,776 |
| Australia | $45,711 |
| South Africa | $5,521 |
Major East Asian economies occupy very different levels. Japan is about $30,520 and Korea $28,059, while China is about $9,015, Indonesia $3,189 and Viet Nam $2,992. India is around $1,907. In North America, the United States is $58,997, Canada $41,986 and Mexico $7,444, showing a similarly wide spread within one broad geographic region.
Within Europe, Germany is about $42,982, France $36,448, Italy $29,682 and Spain $25,104. Those are high relative to the world median but still well below Luxembourg, Norway and Switzerland. The Russian Federation is about $8,993. Australia and New Zealand are much higher at roughly $45,711 and $40,731, respectively.
The map shows a high-income cluster across Northern and Western Europe
Northern and Western Europe form the clearest high-value cluster. Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Iceland all sit in high bands, while Switzerland, the Netherlands, Austria, Germany and France are also well above the global median. The United States and Canada extend the high-value pattern across much of North America, and Australia and New Zealand form a separate high-income cluster in Oceania.
Asia is more heterogeneous. Singapore is in the global top ten, Japan and Korea are above $25,000, while China is near $9,000 and several South and Southeast Asian economies are below $5,000. The Middle East is also mixed: Qatar is about $51,677 and Israel $43,495, while many other economies sit much lower. Geographic proximity therefore does not imply a similar adjusted-income level.
Sub-Saharan Africa contains many of the lowest values in the same-year set. South Africa is around $5,521 and Nigeria about $1,663, while Burundi, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Liberia, Somalia and Mozambique are below $500. The indicator alone cannot assign a cause to that pattern. It combines national income, population, fixed-capital consumption and resource depletion rather than isolating any one of them.
A high value is not the same as high household income or purchasing power
Adjusted net national income per capita is an economy-wide average. It says nothing about how income is distributed between households, whether the median household earns much less than the mean, or how taxes and transfers affect disposable income. A country with twice the per-capita adjusted national income of another does not necessarily provide twice the cash income to a typical household.
Current-dollar conversion adds another caution. Exchange-rate movements can change the U.S.-dollar value even when domestic-currency income changes little, and the series does not adjust for differences in local prices. Purchasing-power comparisons call for PPP measures, while real growth over time is better examined with constant-price series. The advantage of this indicator is narrower: it puts national income on a common currency basis after deducting produced-capital consumption and natural-resource depletion.
Why the 16 older latest observations are excluded
The World Bank API can return each economy’s most recent non-empty observation, producing 185 rows in the source file. Sixteen are not dated 2021. Hong Kong SAR, China retains a 1980 observation; French Polynesia and New Caledonia retain 2000 observations; Eritrea 2011; Venezuela 2014; South Sudan 2015; the United Kingdom and Yemen 2018; Cuba, Kuwait and Turkmenistan 2019; and Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Türkiye and the United Arab Emirates 2020.
Mixing those values into a 2021 ranking would create a time-comparison problem disguised as a geographic comparison. That problem is especially serious for a current-dollar indicator because prices and exchange rates differ across years. All rankings, summary statistics and map points in this article therefore use the 169 observations explicitly dated 2021 rather than the broader latest-available set.
This is not an adjusted-savings score or a complete sustainability index
The word “adjusted” can make the series sound broader than it is. World Bank methodology states that adjusted net national income accounts for consumption of fixed capital and depletion of forest, energy and mineral resources within national-accounting boundaries. It does not make the same human-capital and pollution-damage adjustments used in adjusted net savings. The two measures answer different questions and should not be treated as substitutes.
A high adjusted net national income also does not mean an economy has little resource depletion. A very high starting GNI can leave a high final value even after substantial deductions, while a low-income economy can have a low adjusted value even when depletion is modest. Evaluating sustainability requires additional evidence on resource depletion, adjusted savings, natural-resource rents, forest depletion, emissions and other physical and economic indicators.
Data source and mapping method
The statistical source is World Bank World Development Indicators series NY.ADJ.NNTY.PC.CD. The World Bank defines adjusted net national income as GNI minus consumption of fixed capital and natural-resource depletion, with this series expressed per person in current U.S. dollars. The official data page lists the series through 2021 and identifies the license as CC BY 4.0.
The map plots all 169 observations dated 2021 at representative country locations. Because the values range from roughly $151 to $77,781, a logarithmic color scale is used so that differences among lower and middle values remain visible. The bars, tables, rankings, mean, median and percentile calculations all use the original untransformed dollar observations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does adjusted net national income per capita measure?
It starts with GNI, subtracts consumption of fixed capital and natural-resource depletion, and divides the result by population. This series is reported in current U.S. dollars.
Which economy has the highest 2021 value?
Among the 169 observations dated 2021, Luxembourg is highest at about $77,781 per person, followed by Norway at about $69,953 and Switzerland at about $69,632.
Why are only 169 economies compared instead of all 185 latest observations?
Sixteen latest non-empty observations are dated from 1980 through 2020. They are excluded so the map and rankings compare one common year rather than mixing periods.
Does a high value mean households are richer and the economy is more sustainable?
Not by itself. The indicator is an economy-wide average, does not measure income distribution or local purchasing power, and is not a complete environmental or sustainability score.
Related Articles
Global GDP per Capita Map – Country Levels in 2025
How Large Are Natural Resource Rents Relative to GDP? 2021 World Map
How Large Are Forest Rents Relative to GDP? 2021 World Map
Green Map creates custom-edited map images using open geographic data sources such as geoBoundaries, Natural Earth, OpenStreetMap, and government open data.
These maps are edited visual materials, not raw data files, and are provided for education, documents, presentations, and graphic reference.
