Private Provision in Pre-Primary Education: 142 Country Observations from 2018–2020

The role of private institutions in pre-primary education varies dramatically across countries. World Bank series SE.PRE.PRIV.ZS measures the percentage of total pre-primary enrolment that is in institutions not operated by a public authority and instead controlled and managed by private bodies. Those bodies can include nonprofit organisations, religious organisations, foundations, associations and businesses. The indicator is therefore about the institutional structure of enrolment. It is not a measure of private tutoring, household education spending or the share of children paying full market fees.

The latest available country and area values number 208, but their reference years range from 1979 to 2020. Mixing all of them into one league table would combine institutional differences with decades of time difference. The main map and ranking therefore focus on the 142 observations dated 2018–2020. Their unweighted median is 30.01% and their simple mean is 39.25%. Korea is 77.31% in 2018, well above the recent-group median.

What the private pre-primary enrolment share measures

World Bank metadata describes private enrolment as pupils or students enrolled in institutions that are not operated by a public authority but are controlled and managed by a private body. The private body may operate for profit or not for profit. In practical terms, the indicator divides enrolment in private pre-primary institutions by total pre-primary enrolment and expresses the result as a percentage.

That definition matters because a private institution can still receive public subsidies, and national systems draw the public-private boundary in different ways. A value of 80% does not mean families finance 80% of pre-primary education or that 80% of institutions operate without government support. It means that 80% of enrolled pre-primary students were classified as attending privately managed institutions under the reporting framework.

The recent-group median is 30.01% across 142 observations

Giving every country or area one equal observation, the 2018–2020 median is 30.01% and the simple mean is 39.25%. The first quartile is about 14.10% and the third quartile about 62.11%. The mean is noticeably higher than the median because the upper end contains many observations close to 100%. These statistics describe the distribution of country and area rows; they are not weighted by the number of children enrolled.

Twenty-seven observations are below 10%, 30 are between 10% and below 25%, and 36 are between 25% and below 50%. Another 20 fall between 50% and below 75%, 19 between 75% and below 90%, and 10 are at 90% or more. The spread therefore covers almost the entire 0–100% scale, showing that countries rely on very different mixes of public and private provision.

Bahrain and Samoa reach 100%, while Ireland and Hong Kong are near 99%

Bahrain and Samoa are reported at 100% in the recent comparison, followed by Ireland at 99.00%, Hong Kong at 98.95% and New Zealand at 98.75%. Indonesia is also very high at 94.62% in 2018. These values show that most enrolled pre-primary students were in privately managed institutions. They do not establish that overall participation in pre-primary education was high.

A country can have a high private share even when only a limited proportion of children of pre-primary age are enrolled, because the denominator contains enrolled students rather than all children in the relevant age group. Conversely, a country can have near-universal pre-primary participation but a low private share if public provision is extensive. Gross or net pre-primary enrolment rates answer the participation question.

Very low values indicate a predominantly public enrolment structure

Belarus is 0.08% in 2018, Moldova 0.68% in 2019, Ukraine 0.83%, the Russian Federation 1.57%, and Bulgaria 1.81%. Such low values indicate that almost all reported pre-primary enrolment was in publicly operated institutions in those observations. They should not automatically be translated into an absence of private childcare or other early-childhood services, because systems differ in what is classified inside formal pre-primary education.

Early-childhood services sit at the boundary of education and care more often than later school levels. Some countries place younger children mainly in welfare or childcare systems, while others integrate more services into the education framework. International classifications improve comparability, but national administrative arrangements still matter when interpreting very low or very high values.

Korea is 77.31%, Japan 76.40%, and China 56.70%

Korea is 77.31% in 2018 and Japan is 76.40% in the same year. China is 56.70% in 2019 and the United States 40.37% in 2018. Germany is 64.94% and the United Kingdom 53.11%, while France is much lower at 13.42%. Australia is 84.73% and Indonesia 94.62%. India is 21.72%, Brazil 23.03%, Mexico 15.33%, and South Africa 5.54%.

These are not rankings of educational quality or policy success. A private share measures how enrolment is divided by institutional control. There is no universal rule that a higher or lower percentage is better. Access, affordability, public subsidies, regulatory standards, teacher qualifications, class sizes and learning environments would all be needed for a broader policy assessment.

Private provision differs sharply even within the same region

Korea and Japan are both around 76–77%, China is about 57%, Indonesia is close to 95%, and India is near 22%. Europe is similarly varied: Ireland is almost entirely private in this classification, while France, Finland and Sweden are around 13–18%; Germany is nearly 65%. Regional labels therefore conceal very different institutional arrangements.

The contrasts cannot be explained by income or culture alone. The historical role of religious and nonprofit providers, the scale of municipal provision, subsidies to private institutions, compulsory-school starting ages, and whether care services are administratively counted as education can all influence the ratio. The map identifies where the public-private mix differs; it does not establish the cause of those differences.

Why the main comparison does not rank all 208 latest values together

The 208 latest available observations span 1979–2020. Most of the recent concentration is in 2018 and 2019, with 74 and 65 rows respectively, plus three observations from 2020. Other countries have much older final observations. Treating a 1990s value as directly comparable with a 2019 value would turn part of the ranking into a measure of time difference.

The main analysis therefore uses only the 142 observations dated 2018–2020. This is still a three-year window rather than a perfectly synchronized single year, so small percentage-point gaps should not be treated as a precise league table. For a detailed bilateral comparison, matching the same reference year in UIS or national statistics is preferable.

Private share and overall pre-primary participation answer different questions

SE.PRE.PRIV.ZS uses total pre-primary enrolment as its denominator. A value of 90% does not mean 90% of all children of pre-primary age attend private education. It means that, among children enrolled in pre-primary education, nine in ten are classified in private institutions. A gross or net enrolment ratio instead compares enrolment with the population of the corresponding age group.

The two types of indicators become more informative when read together. A country with a high private share and high overall participation may rely heavily on private providers for broad access. A high private share combined with low participation could indicate that limited formal provision is concentrated in private institutions. A low private share with high participation may point to a large public system. Those interpretations require the separate participation indicator rather than this ratio alone.

Source and interpretation limits

The figures use World Bank World Development Indicators series SE.PRE.PRIV.ZS. The World Bank describes private enrolment as enrolment in institutions that are not operated by a public authority but are controlled and managed by private bodies, whether for profit or not. The underlying education statistics are sourced from the UNESCO Institute for Statistics. International education classifications support comparison, but the financing and administrative treatment of private institutions can differ across countries.

The recent median and mean are descriptive statistics across 142 observations dated 2018–2020, giving each country or area equal weight. They are not global child-weighted or enrolment-weighted averages. Missing observations are not converted to zero, and rows dated 2017 or earlier are excluded from the recent ranking. The indicator does not directly measure education quality, household costs, teacher supply or total pre-primary participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Articles

These Green Map education comparisons answer different questions about educational attainment and can help place the public-private enrolment structure in a broader education context.

• Primary Education Attainment Among Adults 25+
• Short-Cycle Tertiary Attainment Among Adults 25+
• Bachelor’s-or-Higher Educational Attainment Among Adults 25+